There’s a particular kind of paralysis that happens when you love people more than you love being alone.
You’re the one who naturally steps into leadership. You’re energized by collaboration. You light up in group settings. You see problems and immediately think about who else should be in the room to solve them. You imagine your business as a thriving community, not a solo venture. And somewhere along the way, you convinced yourself that this meant you needed to wait for the perfect co-founder before you could actually start.
This is one of the most common lies service-based entrepreneurs tell themselves. And it’s costing you time you don’t have and momentum you desperately need.
The Paradox Nobody Names
Here’s the truth: loving community doesn’t mean you need a business partner to begin. It means you understand something most solopreneurs miss—that real growth happens through connection, not isolation. But somewhere between recognizing your collaborative nature and actually launching, many aspiring coaches, healers, and creators get stuck in a waiting game.
They tell themselves: “I’ll wait for the right co-founder.” “I need someone to bounce ideas off.” “This would be so much better with a partner.” “I can’t build a community by myself.”
All of these statements contain a grain of truth. But they’re missing a crucial distinction: waiting for external validation (or a co-founder) is not the same as needing one to start.
Fernanda, an intuitive healer and natural community builder, experienced this firsthand. She’d spent years facilitating group healing circles and mentoring other practitioners. She had a gift for bringing people together, creating safe spaces, and nurturing genuine connection. When she finally decided to launch her own coaching practice, her first instinct was to find a co-founder. Someone with business expertise. Someone to share the load. Someone to validate her vision.
She waited for eight months.
During those eight months, she attended networking events looking for the “right partner.” She had coffee meetings with potential collaborators. She refined her pitch, created documents, and imagined all the ways a partnership would solve her problems. She told herself that once she found that person, everything would click into place.
Then one day, exhausted by the search and running out of excuses, she started her coaching practice anyway. Solo. She told herself it was temporary, a holding pattern until the right partner appeared. She set up a simple website, started posting weekly content, and began taking clients one at a time.
Three months later, she realized something: she wasn’t waiting for a co-founder anymore. She was building something real.
Three Paths, All Valid
Here’s what most people don’t understand about community building: there isn’t one right way to do it. There are three legitimate paths, each with its own timing, emotional journey, and eventual outcome.
Path One: Building Solo and Inviting Collaborators Later
This is Fernanda’s path. You start alone. You build the foundation, understand your vision deeply, and establish your voice without compromise. You make decisions quickly because you don’t need consensus. You learn what actually matters to your community because you’re listening directly to them, not filtering through a partner’s preferences.
The beauty of this path is that when you eventually invite collaborators, partners, or team members, you’re doing it from a position of strength and clarity. You know exactly what your community values. You’ve proven the model works. You’re not bringing someone in to “complete” you or validate your vision—you’re inviting them into something that’s already working.
Priya, a somatic coach in Brooklyn, started solo with a simple vision: create a space where high-achieving women could unlearn perfectionism. For the first year, she ran everything herself—the weekly group sessions, the content creation, the client communications. She wasn’t waiting for a partner because she was too busy building the thing itself.
By year two, she’d developed a waitlist. By year three, she brought on another coach to meet demand. That partnership, when it finally happened, wasn’t born from desperation or incompleteness. It was a logical next step in an already-thriving model.
Path Two: Managing Someone Else’s Community in a Partnership Model
This path looks different. You’re not starting from scratch; you’re collaborating with someone who already has an established community or platform. You bring your expertise in community building, facilitation, and transformation, while your partner brings the infrastructure, audience, or brand recognition.
This model works beautifully for collaborative builders who’d rather innovate within an existing structure than build one from the ground up. You get the community energy you crave without the solo building phase.
Marcus, a mindfulness teacher, took this path. He partnered with an existing wellness platform that had an audience but lacked skilled facilitation and community care. He didn’t start solo. Instead, he joined an existing ecosystem and brought his gift for connection to their community. The platform benefited from his expertise; he benefited from their reach. Both parties got what they needed faster.
Path Three: Finding a Co-Founder Early
And then there’s the path where you genuinely do find the right person early. It’s less common than people think, but it happens. When it does, it’s usually because both founders are aligned on vision, have complementary skills, and are equally committed to the work from day one.
The key distinction: they started because the vision was compelling, not because they were waiting for permission. They came together to solve a problem or serve a community, not to complete each other’s deficiencies.
Sofia and James, both therapists, founded a group practice together because they shared a specific vision: create a healing space for LGBTQ+ clients that centered cultural specificity and somatic work. They didn’t meet and decide to start a business together. They met through mutual professional circles, discovered they had the same vision, and decided to build it together. The partnership was the accelerator, not the prerequisite.
The Assessment: Which Path Is Actually Yours?
Before you make this decision, sit with these questions. Be honest.
On Community and Leadership:
Do you feel energized by facilitating groups, or do you feel energized by the idea of facilitating groups? There’s a difference. One is a genuine preference; the other is a story you’ve told yourself. Real community builders light up in the work itself—the group calls, the messaging, the connection—not in the fantasy of it.
On Waiting:
Are you genuinely unable to start until you find a partner, or are you using the search for a partner as a reason not to start? Be ruthless with yourself here. “I need to find the right person” is sometimes code for “I’m afraid to fail on my own.”
On Skills:
Is there a genuine skill gap that a co-founder would solve, or are you assuming you need everything figured out before you begin? Most solopreneurs figure things out as they go. You don’t need a business expert; you need courage to learn and adjust.
On Energy:
Do you feel genuinely depleted at the thought of working alone, or is that a fear talking? Working solo is different from isolation. Solo doesn’t mean you never collaborate, reach out, or build community. It means you’re the owner of the vision and the decision-maker.
On Timeline:
If you started today, alone, what would you lose? Now ask: is what you’d lose worth the time you’re spending waiting?
The Emotional Architecture of Solo Building
Here’s what nobody tells you about starting solo when you love people: it’s an act of self-ownership.
For years, maybe decades, you’ve been the one who shows up for others. You facilitate their growth. You create space for their transformation. You listen to their problems and offer solutions. And in doing that meaningful work, you’ve learned something dangerous: you’ve learned that your value comes from being there for others.
Starting solo means something radical: it means you’re starting for yourself. For your vision. For your commitment to something that matters to you. And that can feel selfish if you’re not careful about the language.
It’s not. It’s the most generous thing you can do.
Because when you finally stop waiting for permission—in the form of a co-founder, a perfect partner, or external validation—you actually start building something that has the potential to genuinely impact people. Not someday. Now.
Fernanda told me this about her breakthrough moment: “I realized I’d been waiting for someone else to give me permission to be a leader. But the community didn’t need permission from me. They needed me to show up, make decisions, and trust that people would come. Once I did that, everything changed.”
The relief that comes with stopping the search is profound. You stop optimizing for the ideal partnership and start building for the real community. You stop waiting and start creating. You claim ownership not because you’re arrogant or don’t believe in collaboration, but because you finally understand that collaboration can come later, but vision has to come now.
The Path Forward
You don’t need to know which of these three paths is “right” forever. You need to know which one is right for today.
Maybe you build solo for a year and bring someone on. Maybe you find a partnership early and that becomes your engine. Maybe you manage someone else’s community and discover you want to build your own. The path can change.
What can’t change is the requirement to start. And the most dangerous myth about starting is that you need permission in the form of a perfect co-founder, a complete business plan, or external validation.
You don’t. You just need to show up, claim what’s yours, and let people come.
The community you’re meant to build is waiting for exactly what you bring. Stop waiting for someone else to build it with you. Start building it yourself. The collaboration, the ease, the relief—all of it will follow.
Leave a Reply